<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Adding Understanding</title>
  <subtitle>A place for those who add understanding to the world.</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://addingunderstanding.com/2005/06/snowboard-maker-found-not-liable"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://addingunderstanding.com/node/827/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://addingunderstanding.com/node/827/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2005-06-02T14:01:29-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Snowboard maker found not-liable</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://addingunderstanding.com/2005/06/snowboard-maker-found-not-liable" />
    <id>http://addingunderstanding.com/2005/06/snowboard-maker-found-not-liable</id>
    <published>2005-06-02T13:55:29-06:00</published>
    <updated>2005-06-02T14:01:29-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>joshb</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Law and Public Policy" />
    <category term="Search and Rescue" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In the first such case to go to trial a civil jury found that Swiss snowboard maker Nidecker was not liable for the 2002 death of 22-year-old Kate Svitek. Svitek's estate had asked the company be held liable because the <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/front_page/1117274376112361.xml&amp;coll=7">snowboard's bindings</a> were not release bindings. The company at one time had offered release bindings but stopped because of poor sales. No studies have been done to measure the impact of release bindings. Proponents of the status-quo suggest that the fixed bindings prevent additional injury from a situation where one foot releases and the other foot is still attached to the board.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In the first such case to go to trial a civil jury found that Swiss snowboard maker Nidecker was not liable for the 2002 death of 22-year-old Kate Svitek. Svitek's estate had asked the company be held liable because the <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/front_page/1117274376112361.xml&amp;coll=7">snowboard's bindings</a> were not release bindings. The company at one time had offered release bindings but stopped because of poor sales. No studies have been done to measure the impact of release bindings. Proponents of the status-quo suggest that the fixed bindings prevent additional injury from a situation where one foot releases and the other foot is still attached to the board.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
